One of the most offensive descriptions in all of “journalism”as

By on Oct 8, 2018

it proves the ignorance not only of the writer but society at large and it occurs in this sentence, “The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, “ If “educated women”  does not offend you either consider yourself an “educated woman” and those who love country and family and God uneducated or you have no idea what education means. Likely a combination of both. You are not so far gone as Chevy Chase referring to Jane Curtain as “you ignorant slut” but you are not many steps away as the term does not imply or indicate anything to do with “education” but with agreement. The term indicates you are only “educated” as a woman (and a man I might add) if you agree with the...

Welcome to 1984

By on Sep 25, 2018

AND make no mistake about it – though he doesn’t mention it – this is the deep state. You may choose or dismiss what you want as true but the headline and the closing sentence are most definitely TRUE – “Never in history have humans been so near to losing all comprehension of reality as in today’s world in which there is no respect for truth.” Welcome To The Truth-Free World Authored by Paul Craig Roberts, Truth Is Evaporating Before Our Eyes – Does anyone notice? On September 17, I posted my column, “Evidence is no longer a Western value.” I used as an example the blame that has been put on Russia for the shot down Malaysian airliner. No evidence whatsoever exists for the accusation, and massive evidence has been presented that the airliner was shot down by the neonazis that seized power as a result of the Washington-organized coup in Ukraine....

Not sure what more can be said.

By on Sep 24, 2018

Really not sure what more example of the hypocrisy and idiocy and agenda of the democrats and their propaganda arm, the msm, there can be — If this doesn’t convince you I am sure nothing will. Rest well in your ignorance and may God grant you mercy that you might admit truth when it stares you in the face. Dems Ignore Keith Ellison Abuse Claims Despite Actual Evidence From Female Accuser  by Tyler Durden Mon, 09/24/2018 – 18:25 As Democratic leaders continue to call for feds to investigate decades-old “credible” sexual harassment claims against Judge Brett Kavanaugh, the same Democrats, with the exception of Hawaii Senator Mazie Hirono, continue to remain largely silent over claims by two women who have accused Six term congressman and Deputy DNC Chair Keith Ellison of physical and verbal abuse. In August, Ellison’s former partner, Karen, Monahan,...

One of the best questions ever.

By on Sep 7, 2018

If ever you wondered just how colluded the msm was…

By on Aug 23, 2018

here is an example of the msm not only receiving marching orders but an even better example of just how ignorant these talking heads are. The President cannot be impeached for ANYTHING he may have done before becoming President – NOT ANYTHING. So, either this collection of fools does not know what the word impeachment means or they have their order which they follow to the letter. Either way that makes them either imbeciles (I believe this is the majority) or people without ANY moral core whatsoever. Can you imagine a bunch of people so ignorant they say something so UNTRUE, so idiotic 222 Times? Worse, can you imagine the audience that believes it? CNN, MSNBC Say ‘Impeachment’ 222 Times in One Day By Bill D’Agostino | August 23, 2018 10:48 AM EDT Liberal cable news outlets evidently had their own fairy tale ending in mind when former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen pleaded...

There is idiocy and then there is this.

By on Aug 17, 2018

There really is no polite way to describe the author of this piece. She is an idiot. Unfortunately, what may even be worse is that USA Today actually published this idiocy meaning they have at least one editorial editor that is also an idiot. As the saying goes, you are entitled to your own opinion you are not entitled to your own facts. It would seem that the author of this piece and the editors at USA Today believe they are. Not sure which is scarier, believing you are entitled to your own facts or truly believing your own facts. If you truly believe something that is demonstrably false as being true doesn’t that make you some sort of psychopath? Not that any of this is even worth pointing out as the idiocy is plain to see but I would ask two things: Why are these ideas only brought up when a republican is in office? Why, when the congress and executive branches of gov’t...