the magazine “specifically features and promotes black and brown lgbtqa creatives”? Does that mean that no lgbtqa whites are allowed? I mean, the publication is going to have a small enough audience as it is but if you get rid of the white lgbtqa crowd the audience shrinks to near invisibility. With next to no readers the question begs, who is paying for the magazine since advertisers are going to be very scarce? To illustrate how ridiculous the segregation and balkanization obama promoted has become , of course, the very first thing that comes to mind is, imagine a magazine titled, No Blacks Allowed, that “specifically features and promotes white heterosexual creatives who have lifted and continue to lift the world out of poverty via their brains and the freedom gained and bestowed upon them by the white founding fathers of this great country”, there would be no end to the furor. Unfortunately, it is much worse than simply ridiculous as it is another example, just like Parkwood, of allowing the inmates to run the asylum by exploiting children and in this case children that should be receiving psychiatric help. That’s right, I said it.
Alas, there is nary a whisper when a group of psychologically challenged, social misfits announce more tribalism.And if you doubt that just look at these two quotes from students, Kayla Ramey (who, for some reason has removed them from the facebook page) and Katie Gee:
“Support from white people and heterosexual people is appreciated but is not necessary for the success of this event,” she continued, stating in a second comment that “inclusion is not inherently good, and exclusion is not inherently bad.”
“equality is just more cishet [cisgender heterosexual] white supremacist patriarchy trying to write the narrative.”
While I pity these poor, misguided souls who are encouraged in the lie they live by socialists whose only concern is making more democrat voters by breaking society down into smaller and smaller groups, I am left with but one thought as pertains to the University of Texas, San Antonio, WHERE ARE THE ADULTS?
Texas students launch ‘No Whites Allowed’ magazine
-
A group of students at the University of Texas, San Antonio plans to start publishing a “No Whites Allowed” (NWA) magazine.
-
White people are welcome to attend the launch party Thursday night, but while their support is “appreciated,” the founders insist that “it’s a zine for QPOC and by QPOC [queer persons of color].”
A group of students at the University of Texas, San Antonio plans to start publishing a “No Whites Allowed” (NWA) magazine.
According to a Facebook event titled “Zine Release,” the magazine will be revealed on March 1 at La Botanica, which describes itself as “Texas’ first vegan restaurant with a full bar and performance and event venue.”
“So you’re saying that because segregation happened, it’s fine to be racist against Whites?”
“Thursday at La Botanica from 8-11pm there will be the NWA Zine release party! This zine specifically features and promotes black and brown lgbtqa creatives,” the description states. “We hope to showcase our talent and create an open space for our voices to be heard.”
The description goes on to explain that “for a very long time, black and brown people, especially those who are queer, have been told that they don’t have a space. That they don’t have a voice or a say. With this we would like to create a space.”
Student Kayla Ramey further elaborated on the event’s purpose in a comment.
“I keep having to make this post but I’ll try it one last time so everyone clearly understands. The name of the zine is No Whites Allowed. It’s a zine for QPOC and by QPOC,” Ramey wrote, noting that while “white people are welcome to come to the event,” the “main goal is to celebrate and empower people that society routinely ignores and rejects.”
“Support from white people and heterosexual people is appreciated but is not necessary for the success of this event,” she continued, stating in a second comment that “inclusion is not inherently good, and exclusion is not inherently bad.”
An individual named Thor Menslage questioned whether the event would constitute “racism” by excluding “whites,” but he was rebuffed by defenders of the event who stated that “there have literally been whites-only establishments that were government sanctioned and approved.”
“So you’re saying that because segregation happened, it’s fine to be racist against Whites?” Menslage countered, to which another student, Katie Gee scoffed that “equality is just more cishet [cisgender heterosexual] white supremacist patriarchy trying to write the narrative.”
“We have a host of liberal organizations who regularly pass around anti-white propaganda,” one anonymous student told Campus Reform. “Our campus does nothing about this, doesn’t label it hate speech, won’t remove it, etc.”
UTSA Chief Communications Officer Joe Izbrand, however, told Campus Reform that the flyer had, in fact, been removed by university officials upon its discovery.
“This flyer showed up on Feb. 15,” he said. “It was not approved or authorized by the university and was not affiliated with any campus organization or event. It was immediately removed.”
Campus Reform also reached out to Ramey, but did not receive a response in time for publication.