A follow up to, “Again, I don’t care what side you are on.”

By on Feb 4, 2017

Lets see, the very vertically and mentally challenged professor from Berkley made these asinine claims on Wed. that the “protesters” were right wing paramilitary associated with Breitbart – of course, there was not a shred of evidence but that didn’t even give him or the rest of left pause. Others that do not care about the truth, including The Young Turks, carried that ball even further and what is the result? It seems that at least one of the thug “protesters” is on the payroll of the university – I wonder if the good professor who walks close to the ground will be apologizing? The great news is that the days of the msm saying whatever they want and passing it off as the truth ARE OVER – What does amaze though is that no matter how many times they are made to look like fools while increasingly destroying their credibility they just...

Have these people no shame whatsoever?

By on Feb 4, 2017

The only conclusions any rational person can draw from Senator Chris Murphy’s remarks are that he is either an idiot or a liar, there are no other alternatives. In either case, what does it say about the people of Connecticut that they would have someone with EITHER of those characteristics representing them. And therein lies the real problem. The majority in CT either like having an idiot represent them or they like being lied to. In a sane world Murphy would be shamed out of office by people who were offended at how stupid he must think they are. The fact that he has the nerve to even say such a thing only proves he is right about the mental acumen of his constituents. Very, very sad. Chris Murphy Claims that Anti-Trump Protests Have Been “Peaceful Without Exception” By Chris Queen Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) must live in some sort of alternate universe. On MSNBC, the senator...

Again, I don’t care what side you are on

By on Feb 4, 2017

These two videos speak so much for themselves that all needs be said is watch your ears, for the NYU professor in the first one must be the professor of filth and watch your eyes for the Berkley professor in the second one lies so blatantly that it might blind you. All you can say is what kind of parents send their kids to schools like these? First up, nutty professor from NYU, keep your children away – Next up, a very short man in both stature and mental acumen. You really only need listen to the first two minutes or so. I promise you you will not believe what you hear. Since no one can be that stupid there is only one alternative...

How is this even possible?

By on Feb 3, 2017

When government and law enforcement officials get their jobs either by appointment or election do they not take an oath to enforce the law? Do they not vow to uphold the constitution? Are local officials not bound to the laws of their state? How in the world is it possible for sheriffs and mayors and town councils to not only disobey the law but to encourage, aid and abet others with breaking the law? How can the councilman in the story below say, “…“we are sharing know-your-rights materials with our constituents…”? What rights do those who have already broken the law have? Look, I am as sympathetic to the plight of the illegal alien as anyone but somewhere along the line something resembling sanity has to return to this country. Assimilation is the key to immigration not the formation of the country you left inour country. From 1920 something until 196o...

When trying to figure out what is really going on

By on Feb 3, 2017

the very first thing you should do is ignore whatever the msm is peddling but if you simply can’t turn them off than assume that what they are peddling is the exact opposite of what is really going on. As an example lets take the Berkley “protests” which were hardly protests for what is there to protest when all a man is doing is speaking some words? Are you protesting his right to speak? Protesting the meaning of his words before you even hear them? And how can you protest the meaning of words? You can disagree with the meaning but how can you protest a meaning? Shouldn’t protests be reserved for that which is deemed UNJUST? Perhaps if the speaker had the authority to create a law and then enforce it a protest could be organized against such a law but to be anarchists when nothing more than one man’s opinion is being shared with people who pay money to...