a) why nothing has ever come of this b) why the congress bothers putting on shows like this c) what dirt they must have on every member of congress d) whether Gowdy and Comey KNOW what small men they are e) why it doesn’t bother them if they know f) where is the prosecution of the law breakers g) why there is not equal justice under the law All these questions from one 2 minute exchange. Just how guilty do some people have to be before those elected and those appointed to enforce the law – ENFORCE the LAW? It really is hard to come up with any explanation but one.In fact, I don’t think rational, reasoning men can possibly use that ability to draw any conclusion from the exchange but ONE. The 2 minute exchange is below. Gowdy: Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that...

what manner of administrator runs these places now and what manner of parent sends their child to places like this? Snowflakes indeed. This goes beyond frozen drops of water that cannot handle even the least bit of heat in the form of someone disagreeing with their indoctrination. This goes to “the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble, or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances”. This goes right to heart of the Constitution. Of course, as I have been saying since Ferguson, what these children of Satan are really after is not free speech but the exercise of religion, specifically the religion of Evangelicals (they have already conquered the Catholic church) wherein lies the only Truth that can stop these monsters. Tell me, how can a...

if we were ever able to get Nancy or any of these people to tell the absolute truth do you really believe anyone believes this? “Speaking of San Francisco, Pelosi said, “Our city is blessed with a large LGBTQ community, and a strong history of legacy— of advocacy…”. The city is “blessed”? Do they know what the word means? Please tell me how the city is blessed. Can it be by another line of her speech? “Innovation must be about inclusion,” she said, What the heck does that mean? The fact that none of it means anything is the point isn’t it? Patronizing platitudes, they are all she knows but worse, they are all her audience wants to hear. You may see the speech here but the speech is not the point. The point is the vapid meaninglessness of the dispensing vessel and the vacuous selfishness of the the receiving. A speaker and an audience with but one care between...

Nonetheless, this really is fascinating. A Startling Anecdote About Online Ad Spending From Restoration Hardware Category 1 storm clouds are gathering over what has traditionally been one of the most lucrative, and perhaps only profitable, sectors to come out of Silicon Valley in decades: online advertising. Two months ago, it was P&G which fired the first shot across the “adtech” bow when not long after it announced it was slashing its digital ad spending because it thought it was not getting the kind of return on investment it desired, it made a striking discovery: “We didn’t see a reduction in the growth rate.” CFO Jon Moeller said “What that tells me is that that spending that we cut was largely ineffective.” Speaking to the WSJ, P&G CEO David Taylor echoed Moeller when he explained that cuts on digital ads are part of a larger strategy to more quickly halt...

WHAT  “protections to gay and transgender individuals” are being “extended”. In this story the farmer is not refusing to sell his apples and donuts in the public square to those suffering from gender or sexual identity disorders, it is only when they desire to make a mockery of HIS religious belief that he does not want them on HIS property. These stories are really too much. The people of East Lansing ought to be ashamed of themselves for two reasons; a) they have not spoken up in support of this farmer and b) that they have elected such boobs to be the mayor and councilmen. Here we have a farmer who believes that marriage is between a man and a woman and he won’t rent out HIS property to those who are confused on this issue. How is it that his belief which scientifically, psychologically, biologically, historically and common-sensically makes infinitely...