We can forget looking at the University for anything resembling sanity as the vast, vast majority are clearly being run by people who have departed the real world. The question that really needs be asked is, WHAT KIND OF PARENTS send their most precious possession to partake of such nonsense? First, can you imagine being the fool who wrote this syllabus? Second, can you imagine anyone signing up and paying money to partake in such nonsense? Third, can you even imagine that more than one person TRULY believes this is a valid course of study? – much more valid course of study would seem an investigation of those who created and those who sign up for this nonsense. This rises to a level of idiocy found nowhere else but on other college campuses, any government agency and almost all Fortune 500 companies. It is truly stunning what these three institutions will do to prevent people...

Could the two Washington gatherings over the past two weekends provide any more stark contrast about the same topic? I don’t believe so. Last week we had women whose main focus was defending their right to murder their child. This week we had their counterpart, women whose main focus was not murdering children. You may twist it and paint it and spin it anyway you want but it is no more complicated than that if you care to get to the bottom line. Without going into long explanations as to why what you saw could not be any more explicit. (Of course, you will be excused if you didn’t see any of this week’s march since the msm didn’t cover it but then that should scream volumes at you as well.) Last week we saw women acting disgustingly, we saw filth come out of their mouths, we saw them wearing filth and we saw the filth they literally left behind. This week we saw...

Putting aside the weakness of the flesh and the lack of love (and likely a father) that turns girls into sluts can the foolishness of man be anymore on display? I am sure the genius legislators had some “sound” reasoning for a 2 year window but I am thinking it had nothing to do with being just or making good law. And what is with this judge? Can these brilliant men of the law only MAKE LAW from the bench when it suits the left? It just does not get any more stupid. Oklahoma Man Ordered To Pay Child Support Despite Not Being Father Posted 10:19 pm, January 12, 2017, by 5NEWS Web Staff, Updated at 10:20PM, January 12, 2017 TULSA (KFSM) — A man in Oklahoma is hoping to change the law after he has to continue to pay child support for a baby that is not his, according to our affiliate KOTV.  When Thomas’ high school girlfriend got pregnant, he married her. Five months later she...

The absence of good (Latin: privatio boni) is a theological doctrine that evil, unlike good, is insubstantial, so that thinking of it as an entity is misleading. Instead, evil is rather the absence or lack (“privation”) of good.It is typically attributed to Augustine, who wrote: And in the universe, even that which is called evil, when it is regulated and put in its own place, only enhances our admiration of the good; for we enjoy and value the good more when we compare it with the evil. For the Almighty God, who, as even the heathen acknowledge, has supreme power over all things, being Himself supremely good, would never permit the existence of anything evil among His works, if He were not so omnipotent and good that He can bring good even out of evil. For what is that which we call evil but the absence of good? In the bodies of animals, disease and wounds mean nothing but...

The title of this post describes what we see in this transcript. An exchange between a liberal useful idiot interviewer and an egopper so entrenched, so practiced, so blinded by the Beltway culture he is not even aware he is a tool of the left. The proof is indisputable. Mike Wallace plays gothca with the typical liberal ploy of conflating two unrelated issues into one, “Do you still beat your wife”, question and the Priebus who is so used to playing the game fumbles around trying to not answer the non-question rather than focusing the exchange on what the topic should be – THE TRUTH. The issue is not by whom or by what means the information was acquired. Sure, hacking may be an issue of national security but this is hardly what the problem is here as is so clearly demonstrated by the simple fact that if it was Republican email that had been released the msm would not...