When government and law enforcement officials get their jobs either by appointment or election do they not take an oath to enforce the law? Do they not vow to uphold the constitution? Are local officials not bound to the laws of their state? How in the world is it possible for sheriffs and mayors and town councils to not only disobey the law but to encourage, aid and abet others with breaking the law? How can the councilman in the story below say, “…“we are sharing know-your-rights materials with our constituents…”? What rights do those who have already broken the law have? Look, I am as sympathetic to the plight of the illegal alien as anyone but somewhere along the line something resembling sanity has to return to this country. Assimilation is the key to immigration not the formation of the country you left inour country. From 1920 something until 196o...

the very first thing you should do is ignore whatever the msm is peddling but if you simply can’t turn them off than assume that what they are peddling is the exact opposite of what is really going on. As an example lets take the Berkley “protests” which were hardly protests for what is there to protest when all a man is doing is speaking some words? Are you protesting his right to speak? Protesting the meaning of his words before you even hear them? And how can you protest the meaning of words? You can disagree with the meaning but how can you protest a meaning? Shouldn’t protests be reserved for that which is deemed UNJUST? Perhaps if the speaker had the authority to create a law and then enforce it a protest could be organized against such a law but to be anarchists when nothing more than one man’s opinion is being shared with people who pay money to...

At what point does enough become enough? When are the willfully blind going to stop willing themselves blind? For these players in the video though, it is not blindness, it is quite intentional and what can the intent be but deception for the sole purpose of affirming the willfully blind or confirming and encouraging those who are as corrupt and as self-serving as the two in the video. Just listen to the two of them – what you hear is the sound of evil. And for heaven’s sake, I am begging you people of color, listen and think. If there were ever an “uncle tom” this puppet Andre Carson is him. He stands there as the very definition of Uncle Tom, humiliatingly subservient to his mistress, Nancy, who is whiter than white and one of the chief plantation creators and enforcers. A hundred and fifty years ago Nancy would have been telling Andre to pick cotton, what she...

It looks fake because our minds have difficulty accepting that molten rock can pour out of the side of a cliff  or, at least that it can pour out in the quantity shown here. If have wondered like me  how people could be trapped by lava but if you look at how “liquid” the lava appears and the speed at which it is pouring out you and I need wonder no more. On a more worldly note, to believe what is shown in the video is merely the result of an interesting geological formation and not a demonstration and warning of how easily the Controller of the lava could cover all land with molten rock is to willfully deny what your eyes see. ‘Firehose’ of lava flows from Kilauea volcano into sea Researchers from the USGS’s Hawaiian Volcano Observatory captured dramatic footage showing a ‘firehose’ of lava flowing from the Kilauea Volcano and into the sea. The video also...

If you can get through this video and still believe in what the speaker represents, who she speaks for, the people and party that support her and the group she speaks for – if you anyway can justify this woman’s behavior and speech I am afraid you are as sick as the speaker. There really is nothing that can be added or need be said as the video says more than anyone could possible say. Simply as a warning to those with children or who might not be able to stomach the f-word, you might want to be ready to shut it off and you certainly do not want children under the age of 14 listening to this. It is also worth noting that the speaker is a teacher only for the additional lesson that is learned from that fact. (click > below to see link)

Of course it is true that no rational person would believe anything written in the Washington Post any more but if these comments about repealing the ACA have been verified and admitted to by the speakers then we can ignore the superficial, lazy and jaundiced reporting and concentrate on the comments. Most of the comments emphasize the fact that the enemy in Washington is no longer the irrelevant democrat party but the democrats that infest the republican party of which there appear to be legion. What is it going to take to convince some of these dolts in the Senate that the reason the dems went from 60 seats in 2010 down to 49 seats in 2016 is precisely because of the ACA? What is it going to take to convince these cowardly “republicans” in the House that most of them would not be there were it not for dems ignoring the will of the people and shoving ACA down our throats?...

We can forget looking at the University for anything resembling sanity as the vast, vast majority are clearly being run by people who have departed the real world. The question that really needs be asked is, WHAT KIND OF PARENTS send their most precious possession to partake of such nonsense? First, can you imagine being the fool who wrote this syllabus? Second, can you imagine anyone signing up and paying money to partake in such nonsense? Third, can you even imagine that more than one person TRULY believes this is a valid course of study? – much more valid course of study would seem an investigation of those who created and those who sign up for this nonsense. This rises to a level of idiocy found nowhere else but on other college campuses, any government agency and almost all Fortune 500 companies. It is truly stunning what these three institutions will do to prevent people...

Could the two Washington gatherings over the past two weekends provide any more stark contrast about the same topic? I don’t believe so. Last week we had women whose main focus was defending their right to murder their child. This week we had their counterpart, women whose main focus was not murdering children. You may twist it and paint it and spin it anyway you want but it is no more complicated than that if you care to get to the bottom line. Without going into long explanations as to why what you saw could not be any more explicit. (Of course, you will be excused if you didn’t see any of this week’s march since the msm didn’t cover it but then that should scream volumes at you as well.) Last week we saw women acting disgustingly, we saw filth come out of their mouths, we saw them wearing filth and we saw the filth they literally left behind. This week we saw...